Adam and adams, not Adamites

[swamidass (S. Joshua Swamidass)]

@gbrooks9

I will count you as an ally on the issue of refuting the Global Flood. We can use plenty of help on that topic.

Is more of an ally than merely that. Though @anon46279830 is more in the “OEC” camp, he is also refrained from defining himself as opposed to evolution. He has not been caught up in making silly arguments against evolutionary science. If more OEC and YEC leaders were like him, we would be in a much more healthy place.

Even if evolution is wrong, it is not worth it to make bad arguments against it. Even if evolution is true, Jesus is greater.

@anon46279830

They shouldn’t be, because it is not what the scriptures teach, it does not point to Christ theologically, and Joshua’s work has falsified the Hugh Ross framework scientifically. Most of them are still happy with their model but they won’t be long. Really, Ross at some point has an obligation to adjust his model with the new evidence from ancient DNA.

I have a good relationship with Hugh Ross and AJ Roberts. It is on the books now, too, to be a visiting scholar for a week this year. It will be interesting to see how the conversations go. Maybe they will adjust. Both @Guy_Coe and @anon46279830 might be able to make headway there with them. You should keep engaging with them.