Since some seem to think no such thing exists. You have to scroll down past the stuff about Behe to read it:
This didn’t really (IMHO) deserve to be a brand new topic when there was already one open on this subject. And especially since Buchanan was already brought up there, as well as Sanford’s response to him.
How odd. So why were you claiming no one had responded to Sanford’s claims, when you were already aware of this response?
Something you need to learn: If a creationist writes a bunch of words after someone has refuted his claims, it does not mean the points raised in the refutation have been addressed. It just means the creationist has written a bunch of words.