# A Ubiquitin Response to Gpuccio

**URL:** https://discourse.peacefulscience.org/t/a-ubiquitin-response-to-gpuccio/1608
**Category:** Side Conversation
**Tags:** Design
**Created:** [September 11, 2018, 8:42pm UTC](https://discourse.peacefulscience.org/t/a-ubiquitin-response-to-gpuccio/1608 "2018-09-11T20:42:27Z")
**Posts on this page:** 1
**Showing post:** 7

<div class="post-metadata">

### Author: ![colewd](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/c/ecd19e/32.png) [@colewd](https://discourse.peacefulscience.org/u/colewd)
#### Post date: [September 12, 2018, 5:30pm UTC](https://discourse.peacefulscience.org/t/a-ubiquitin-response-to-gpuccio/1608/7 "2018-09-12T17:30:48Z")

</div>

> [@Theological Premises in Design Arguments?](https://discourse.peacefulscience.org/t/theological-premises-in-design-arguments/1453/184):
>
> The basic argument is no different from Behe’s original mousetrap or Paley’s watch. Wow, how complex? Explain that Darwinists!

His argument is different then both of these arguments. He is measuring functional information as calculated by sequence preservation over deep time. You posted his argument you should make sure you understand it as I know you are certainly capable.

---

_[View the full topic](https://discourse.peacefulscience.org/t/a-ubiquitin-response-to-gpuccio/1608)._