# An Unpeaceful Peace by Casey Luskin

**URL:** <https://discourse.peacefulscience.org/t/an-unpeaceful-peace-by-casey-luskin/14501>\
**Category:** Public Square\
**Tags:** Society\
**Created:** [November 23, 2021, 2:12am UTC](https://discourse.peacefulscience.org/t/an-unpeaceful-peace-by-casey-luskin/14501 "2021-11-23T02:12:27Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 1\
**Showing post:** 3

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![John\_Harshman](https://sea2.discourse-cdn.com/flex016/user_avatar/discourse.peacefulscience.org/john_harshman/32/1121_2.png) [@John\_Harshman](https://discourse.peacefulscience.org/u/John_Harshman)\
**Post date:** [November 23, 2021, 5:14am UTC](https://discourse.peacefulscience.org/t/an-unpeaceful-peace-by-casey-luskin/14501/3 "2021-11-23T05:14:50Z")

</div>

> [@swamidass](#):
>
> There is much to disagree with here, but I’m not sure what specifically is worth spelling out.

You might start with the explicit creationism: refusing to accept that mice and rats (and what of gerbils?) are related, much less humans and chimps; rejecting similarity (and ignoring the very notion of nested similarity) as evidence of descent; claiming common design as an equal, perhaps superior, explanation. I note that he also confuses acceptance of common descent with rejection of ID, even though he claims in that very article that ID is compatible with common descent. Very confused.

---

_[View the full topic](https://discourse.peacefulscience.org/t/an-unpeaceful-peace-by-casey-luskin/14501)._