I am curious what the Peaceful Science community things. This article is anonymous. How would you respond? I’m thinking of responding to @AGauger soon too (Ann Gauger’s Response to My Themelios Review).
I want to point out one thing to commend and adjust.
One, by Joshua Swamidass, is negative. Ann Gauger has already written excellent responses to Dr. Swamidass, a biologist at Washington University in St. Louis, including on the relevant science.
This was not a negative review. It was honest, and had many good things to say about the book.
It’s worth engaging him, since Swamidass is the relatively rare critic of ID who works at tackling arguments for design in a substantive fashion.
Thank you for acknowledging engaging ID substantively. I’m still not convinced, but I do aim to treat ID fairly.