# Casey Luskin DELETES inconvenient evidence

**URL:** <https://discourse.peacefulscience.org/t/casey-luskin-deletes-inconvenient-evidence/17299>\
**Category:** Conversation\
**Tags:** Science\
**Created:** [July 6, 2025, 12:41pm UTC](https://discourse.peacefulscience.org/t/casey-luskin-deletes-inconvenient-evidence/17299 "2025-07-06T12:41:14Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 1\
**Showing post:** 7

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Faizal\_Ali](https://sea2.discourse-cdn.com/flex016/user_avatar/discourse.peacefulscience.org/faizal_ali/32/12416_2.png) [@Faizal\_Ali](https://discourse.peacefulscience.org/u/Faizal_Ali)\
**Post date:** [July 6, 2025, 8:44pm UTC](https://discourse.peacefulscience.org/t/casey-luskin-deletes-inconvenient-evidence/17299/7 "2025-07-06T20:44:48Z")

</div>

I’m tagging a couple of our usual defenders of the DI, because I want to give them the chance to respond to this, and defend the DI’s actions if they believe they are defensible.

@colewd @Giltil

Is there anyone else who should be included?

---

_[View the full topic](https://discourse.peacefulscience.org/t/casey-luskin-deletes-inconvenient-evidence/17299)._
