# Comments on CASE

**URL:** <https://discourse.peacefulscience.org/t/comments-on-case/11389>\
**Category:** Side Conversation\
**Tags:** Comments\
**Created:** [April 25, 2019, 4:11pm UTC](https://discourse.peacefulscience.org/t/comments-on-case/11389 "2019-04-25T16:11:31Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 2\
**Page:** 1

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Mercer](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/m/e274bd/32.png) [@Mercer](https://discourse.peacefulscience.org/u/Mercer)\
**Post date:** [April 25, 2019, 4:11pm UTC](https://discourse.peacefulscience.org/t/comments-on-case/11389/1 "2019-04-25T16:11:31Z")

</div>

> [@Christian that Affirms the Science of Evolution (CASE)](https://discourse.peacefulscience.org/t/christian-that-affirms-the-science-of-evolution-case/5907/1):
>
> That is my position.

It would be better to leave out the “I am nots.”

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![cwhenderson](https://sea2.discourse-cdn.com/flex016/user_avatar/discourse.peacefulscience.org/cwhenderson/32/72_2.png) [@cwhenderson](https://discourse.peacefulscience.org/u/cwhenderson)\
**Post date:** [April 25, 2019, 4:24pm UTC](https://discourse.peacefulscience.org/t/comments-on-case/11389/2 "2019-04-25T16:24:11Z")

</div>

> [@Mercer](#):
>
> It would be better to leave out the “I am nots.”

That may be a really good point. The “I am nots” may be beneficial for clarification, but might not really be what @swamidass wants to emphasize. Certainly something to consider, at least.