I just read this as it is a description of the newest form of the theory of evolution:
So all i get from it is that evolution is not best described in terms of selection for adaptation, but rather an accumulation of mutations passed that over time that increase complexity. I only read the brief description of the paper and not the paper itself. From the description though, it seems,even more illogical than the neo darwinian view. But i may be completely misunderstanding too. I asked if someone else can take the pieces of this theory and speak them in simple laymans terms so guys like me can understand the newest form on evolutionism. I have not heard back but wonder if you help me with that?
The one glaring problem i saw in the intro to the theory is that it presupposes universal common decent first then sets out to show how it works second. If any form of creation is true, this method of discovering will miss it every time. It will only conclude on the grounds established.
Let me know if you understand what this is getting to or not. Thanks