I’ve known a great many scientists (including those who were my colleagues early in my career when I was a science professor) and I can’t think of even one who believed that the scope of science is unlimited.
So I’m wondering if there is a very different viewpoint among scientists in your part of the world??
The Scientific Method (and methodological naturalism, for those who are fine with that term) is by its very definition limited in its scope. Indeed, we’ve discussed those limitations many times on Peaceful Science.