# Cordova and Sanford: Good Enough For A Secular Journal?

**URL:** <https://discourse.peacefulscience.org/t/cordova-and-sanford-good-enough-for-a-secular-journal/7448>\
**Category:** Conversation\
**Tags:** Science\
**Created:** [August 15, 2019, 9:55pm UTC](https://discourse.peacefulscience.org/t/cordova-and-sanford-good-enough-for-a-secular-journal/7448 "2019-08-15T21:55:49Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 1\
**Showing post:** 5

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Art](https://sea2.discourse-cdn.com/flex016/user_avatar/discourse.peacefulscience.org/art/32/3805_2.png) [@Art](https://discourse.peacefulscience.org/u/Art)\
**Post date:** [August 15, 2019, 10:41pm UTC](https://discourse.peacefulscience.org/t/cordova-and-sanford-good-enough-for-a-secular-journal/7448/5 "2019-08-15T22:41:57Z")

</div>

> [@Developing College-Level ID/Creation Courses](https://discourse.peacefulscience.org/t/developing-college-level-id-creation-courses/7408/255):
>
> Yes, I’ll share it since it is on a public pre-print archive. FWIW, we got rejected from the BioRxiv preprint server.

The preprint you shared, @stcordova, reads like a hit piece on Ohno. It is pretty rude and unprofessional. That is enough to reject it from most journals and other scientific venues.

---

_[View the full topic](https://discourse.peacefulscience.org/t/cordova-and-sanford-good-enough-for-a-secular-journal/7448)._