# COVID-19 genome and design detection

**URL:** <https://discourse.peacefulscience.org/t/covid-19-genome-and-design-detection/10675>\
**Category:** Conversation\
**Tags:** Design\
**Created:** [May 7, 2020, 4:12pm UTC](https://discourse.peacefulscience.org/t/covid-19-genome-and-design-detection/10675 "2020-05-07T16:12:59Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 1\
**Showing post:** 24

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Dan\_Eastwood](https://sea2.discourse-cdn.com/flex016/user_avatar/discourse.peacefulscience.org/dan_eastwood/32/2368_2.png) [@Dan\_Eastwood](https://discourse.peacefulscience.org/u/Dan_Eastwood)\
**Post date:** [May 11, 2020, 12:16am UTC](https://discourse.peacefulscience.org/t/covid-19-genome-and-design-detection/10675/24 "2020-05-11T00:16:30Z")

</div>

I spent a lot of time with the 2005 paper, multiple reads reviewing the references. I thought I must be missing something, that Dembski must be doing something I didn’t understand. How else could he have probabilities greater than one? Elberry and Shallit (2011) covered everything else, I’m surprised they missed this.

---

_[View the full topic](https://discourse.peacefulscience.org/t/covid-19-genome-and-design-detection/10675)._