# Discussion of The Design of Life

**URL:** <https://discourse.peacefulscience.org/t/discussion-of-the-design-of-life/12546>\
**Category:** Conversation\
**Tags:** BookClub\
**Created:** [November 24, 2020, 3:06pm UTC](https://discourse.peacefulscience.org/t/discussion-of-the-design-of-life/12546 "2020-11-24T15:06:30Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 1\
**Showing post:** 22

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Art](https://sea2.discourse-cdn.com/flex016/user_avatar/discourse.peacefulscience.org/art/32/3805_2.png) [@Art](https://discourse.peacefulscience.org/u/Art)\
**Post date:** [November 25, 2020, 6:38pm UTC](https://discourse.peacefulscience.org/t/discussion-of-the-design-of-life/12546/22 "2020-11-25T18:38:14Z")

</div>

> [@Eddie and ID books](https://discourse.peacefulscience.org/t/eddie-and-id-books/12609/12):
>
> Similarly, it would be a waste of time to discuss the alleged “error” that Puck thinks he has found in two paragraphs of the Dembski-Wells book, without first trying to assess whether the book overall has any merits.

I believe @Puck_Mendelssohn, in his [widely-read book review](https://www.amazon.com/gp/customer-reviews/R25EKCB8TEEGSQ/ref=cm_cr_srp_d_rvw_ttl?tag=swamidass-20), has provided such an assessment. Other than ill-tempered accusations about bias, there have not been presented in this thread any counter-arguments to the conclusion that the book has no merits.

---

_[View the full topic](https://discourse.peacefulscience.org/t/discussion-of-the-design-of-life/12546)._