I wonder if they will let me write a response.
Go for it if you want, but I donāt see the point.
Honestly I donāt either. Iām actually curious to see how they handle the GAE though.
But I will say that āfine scientistsā is quite an upgrade from Behe calling us āincompetentā and ālesser scientists.ā Anyway, Iāve given ID enough of my time, and I donāt mean that to be dismissive. Itās just that this is not my āday jobā and I just canāt spare the time away from my other pursuits. Iāve got two new research projects getting off the ground, designing and teaching new courses in the next year, and of course Iām starting a new book. I think weāve done our part and Iād like to get back to DOING science rather than criticizing pseudoscience. At least for the next 15-18 months, Iām pretty much fully booked.
I think you must write a response.
To what exactly? Maybe just link to our prior responses? If TGC invited a response from me, I would consider it.
Why? I assume you mean Josh specifically, but I still donāt think we need to respond to every single thing just because they do. Otherwise itās just an endless back and forth. I think weāve said all we need to say. I honestly think weāve done too much responding already.
I think Josh should respond to TGC as a working scientist who happens to be Christian, more of an editorial. He should highlight the fact that there are a lot of Christians who accept evolution as true, who understand human origins, OOL, and modern cosmology. Get rid of the either/or false choice of faith and/or science.
Well TGC is going to really care a lot about GAE.
Iād rather push for them to cover that, which will make those points much more strongly.
It is always nice when a pastor leaps to your defense
Thatās a rather disappointing article from Axe. He seems to have committed the same crimes he has accused others of. As soon as Beheās science is criticized, Axe clutches for his pearls and exclaims, āHow DARE you!!ā. It seems that the DI is better at doling out criticism than in receiving it.