If you mean her challenging the tree and mutation not being front and center of change yes I did. What is very apparent is the mystery of the origin of the eukaryotic cell which is mission critical for universal common descent. Its what she does not try to explain like the origin of the spliceosome that is telling.
She makes the assertion that universal common descent is true as her science depends on that yet if we assume design as a possibility it does not made sense that one came from the other. I would propose that the eukaryotic cell is a separate design from the prokaryotic cell and simply borrows some of the previous designs.
I believe in some common descent of species. The question in my mind is how much.