# How Christians React to the Religion-Science Conflict

**URL:** <https://discourse.peacefulscience.org/t/how-christians-react-to-the-religion-science-conflict/11063>\
**Category:** Conversation\
**Tags:** Society\
**Created:** [July 8, 2020, 12:30pm UTC](https://discourse.peacefulscience.org/t/how-christians-react-to-the-religion-science-conflict/11063 "2020-07-08T12:30:06Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 1\
**Showing post:** 35

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![T\_aquaticus](https://sea2.discourse-cdn.com/flex016/user_avatar/discourse.peacefulscience.org/t_aquaticus/32/1249_2.png) [@T\_aquaticus](https://discourse.peacefulscience.org/u/T_aquaticus)\
**Post date:** [July 10, 2020, 3:06pm UTC](https://discourse.peacefulscience.org/t/how-christians-react-to-the-religion-science-conflict/11063/35 "2020-07-10T15:06:43Z")

</div>

> [@Puck\_Mendelssohn](#):
>
> I am trying to conform most of my usage of colloquial terms to cladistics. It’s a bit harder for some, e.g., “fish,” than for others, but it just makes sense. And I’ve always sort of thought that the non-inclusion of humans in the word “ape” was just a ridiculous sort of human exceptionalism, as we are so very obviously apes in the fullest sense. Yes, we have our weird specializations, but so do the others.

When interacting with the general public I try to use genetic relationships to help illustrate these points. Specifically, chimps share more DNA with humans than they do with gorillas and other apes. If chimps are apes, then we are apes, too.

---

_[View the full topic](https://discourse.peacefulscience.org/t/how-christians-react-to-the-religion-science-conflict/11063)._