I thought the following article was interesting for two reasons. First the science itself is fascinating (at least to a complete layman like myself).
The second reason is the way the article is written. The title and introductory paragraphs make it sound like the research is concluded and facts are known. As you get deeper into the article, and get to the quotes from the scientists, it becomes clear that really what we have is a an interesting hypothesis that requires much more research. However, I wonder how many people read only the first few paragraphs (or only the title) and come away with a wrong impression.
Then I wonder how much of the bad conversations we have around science (or many other topics) are driven by articles written in this way.