# Introducing Troendle

**URL:** <https://discourse.peacefulscience.org/t/introducing-troendle/4957>\
**Category:** Side Conversation\
**Tags:** Introduction\
**Created:** [March 1, 2019, 2:50pm UTC](https://discourse.peacefulscience.org/t/introducing-troendle/4957 "2019-03-01T14:50:15Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 1\
**Showing post:** 17

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![swamidass](https://sea2.discourse-cdn.com/flex016/user_avatar/discourse.peacefulscience.org/swamidass/32/3_2.png) [@swamidass](https://discourse.peacefulscience.org/u/swamidass)\
**Post date:** [March 1, 2019, 6:32pm UTC](https://discourse.peacefulscience.org/t/introducing-troendle/4957/17 "2019-03-01T18:32:27Z")

</div>

> [@Troendle](#):
>
> I was referring more to the special creation of Adam and Eve from dust and Adam’s rib (the Genesis 2 account).

That fits in a GAE too, and does not imply genetic progentitorship. Have you seen this yet? [BioLogos Edits Their Response to Keller](https://discourse.peacefulscience.org/t/biologos-edits-their-response-to-keller/4798)

Of course, literalism may not be the best way to read Genesis. I’m just not sure science shows us it’s wrong.

---

_[View the full topic](https://discourse.peacefulscience.org/t/introducing-troendle/4957)._
