# Is All YEC Really Pseudoscience?

**URL:** <https://discourse.peacefulscience.org/t/is-all-yec-really-pseudoscience/1480>\
**Category:** Side Conversation\
**Created:** [September 4, 2018, 2:12am UTC](https://discourse.peacefulscience.org/t/is-all-yec-really-pseudoscience/1480 "2018-09-04T02:12:17Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 1\
**Showing post:** 15

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![swamidass](https://sea2.discourse-cdn.com/flex016/user_avatar/discourse.peacefulscience.org/swamidass/32/3_2.png) [@swamidass](https://discourse.peacefulscience.org/u/swamidass)\
**Post date:** [September 4, 2018, 4:42am UTC](https://discourse.peacefulscience.org/t/is-all-yec-really-pseudoscience/1480/15 "2018-09-04T04:42:14Z")

</div>

> [@deuteroKJ](#):
>
> I understand the need for qualification and reticence. but ETS is probably close to 50% YEC, so we should have some YEC representation on the panel. Don’t worry, we can find some good reps of the position so it doesn’t turn into “Gish galloping”!

Here is one we certainly should include: @pmcelliott. Did you see his comments on a Genealogical Adam?

> [@Daniel Deen and Joel Oesch: The Lutheran Voice and Crosswise Institute](https://discourse.peacefulscience.org/t/daniel-deen-and-joel-oesch-the-lutheran-voice-and-crosswise-institute/721/55):
>
> In other words, is any part of the clear and universal doctrines of historic Christianity contradicted by a belief in a pre-Adamite humanity. This is more difficult to answer because the idea is so new to me that I have not yet traced out all of its implications. I know that @swamidass takes great pains to show that the possibility of pre-Adamic human beings does not necessarily undermine the historicity of Adam or the doctrine of original sin. If he had not done so, then I would have certainly rejected the notion. **I would be very interested to hear the reflections of others on this question.**

---

_[View the full topic](https://discourse.peacefulscience.org/t/is-all-yec-really-pseudoscience/1480)._