Agreed. And they choose “design”, which means (by their reasoning) that they must reject common descent. They are not accurately characterizing any perspective. They present bad arguments against common descent, which hardly seems like accuracy to me.
Better than most creationists? Faint praise indeed.
Not sure what “it” is here, or how much/how little of what you’re talking about. Whatever it is, my point is that RTB is execrable on the subject of common descent, contrary to your initial statements.