# Polar Bears Again, Is Behe Vindicated?

**URL:** <https://discourse.peacefulscience.org/t/polar-bears-again-is-behe-vindicated/6085>\
**Category:** Conversation\
**Tags:** Science\
**Created:** [May 6, 2019, 5:28pm UTC](https://discourse.peacefulscience.org/t/polar-bears-again-is-behe-vindicated/6085 "2019-05-06T17:28:49Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 1\
**Showing post:** 36

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Giltil](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/g/5f8ce5/32.png) [@Giltil](https://discourse.peacefulscience.org/u/Giltil)\
**Post date:** [May 8, 2019, 6:26pm UTC](https://discourse.peacefulscience.org/t/polar-bears-again-is-behe-vindicated/6085/36 "2019-05-08T18:26:53Z")

</div>

> [@T\_aquaticus](#):
>
> You can cite all of the damaging mutations you want. That doesn’t prove that constructive mutations don’t exist.

ID proponents don’t deny the existence of constructive mutations. But the point is precisely that I can cite all the damaging mutations I want, which you’d have a hard time doing for constructive ones because the former are immeasurably more numerous than the later. Hardly a good configuration for constructive evolution! But rather a good one for devolution.

---

_[View the full topic](https://discourse.peacefulscience.org/t/polar-bears-again-is-behe-vindicated/6085)._