# Probability Arguments for Intelligent Design

**URL:** <https://discourse.peacefulscience.org/t/probability-arguments-for-intelligent-design/2156>\
**Category:** Side Conversation\
**Tags:** Design\
**Created:** [October 9, 2018, 8:24pm UTC](https://discourse.peacefulscience.org/t/probability-arguments-for-intelligent-design/2156 "2018-10-09T20:24:49Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 1\
**Showing post:** 133

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Dan\_Eastwood](https://sea2.discourse-cdn.com/flex016/user_avatar/discourse.peacefulscience.org/dan_eastwood/32/2368_2.png) [@Dan\_Eastwood](https://discourse.peacefulscience.org/u/Dan_Eastwood)\
**Post date:** [October 11, 2018, 10:12pm UTC](https://discourse.peacefulscience.org/t/probability-arguments-for-intelligent-design/2156/133 "2018-10-11T22:12:42Z")

</div>

16 posts were merged into an existing topic: [What was Dembski thinking? (CSI math)](https://discourse.peacefulscience.org/t/what-was-dembski-thinking-csi-math/2204/2)

---

_[View the full topic](https://discourse.peacefulscience.org/t/probability-arguments-for-intelligent-design/2156)._