# Progress after the Royal Society conference?

**URL:** <https://discourse.peacefulscience.org/t/progress-after-the-royal-society-conference/17569>\
**Category:** Conversation\
**Tags:** Science\
**Created:** [December 22, 2025, 5:32pm UTC](https://discourse.peacefulscience.org/t/progress-after-the-royal-society-conference/17569 "2025-12-22T17:32:46Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 1\
**Showing post:** 161

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![RonSewell](https://sea2.discourse-cdn.com/flex016/user_avatar/discourse.peacefulscience.org/ronsewell/32/6194_2.png) [@RonSewell](https://discourse.peacefulscience.org/u/RonSewell)\
**Post date:** [January 13, 2026, 8:49pm UTC](https://discourse.peacefulscience.org/t/progress-after-the-royal-society-conference/17569/161 "2026-01-13T20:49:31Z")

</div>

> [@lee\_merrill](#):
>
> Just (as I have mentioned) they dismiss other statements that they see come from nonreasoning causes, just as you all do here, when you claim my statements are due to some non-reason, such as being sheer speculation, or due to some unthinking commitment to intelligent design, etc.

Stop right now telling me why I reject certain claims. You have been informed previously that my test of anyone’s statements is how they measure against reality, not the source.

---

_[View the full topic](https://discourse.peacefulscience.org/t/progress-after-the-royal-society-conference/17569)._