# Rich Lenski takes down Michael Behe and his ID creationism: Part IV

**URL:** <https://discourse.peacefulscience.org/t/rich-lenski-takes-down-michael-behe-and-his-id-creationism-part-iv/5208>\
**Category:** Side Conversation\
**Tags:** Science\
**Created:** [March 7, 2019, 9:27pm UTC](https://discourse.peacefulscience.org/t/rich-lenski-takes-down-michael-behe-and-his-id-creationism-part-iv/5208 "2019-03-07T21:27:12Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 1\
**Showing post:** 126

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![T\_aquaticus](https://sea2.discourse-cdn.com/flex016/user_avatar/discourse.peacefulscience.org/t_aquaticus/32/1249_2.png) [@T\_aquaticus](https://discourse.peacefulscience.org/u/T_aquaticus)\
**Post date:** [March 14, 2019, 7:34pm UTC](https://discourse.peacefulscience.org/t/rich-lenski-takes-down-michael-behe-and-his-id-creationism-part-iv/5208/126 "2019-03-14T19:34:51Z")

</div>

> [@r\_speir](#):
>
> IDers don’t need to explain stages.

Why wouldn’t they need to explain their theory?

You seem to have an extreme double standard. You expect excruciating detail for evolutionary pathways, but expect absolutely zero detail for how features like the flagellum emerged in the intelligent design model. Why?

---

_[View the full topic](https://discourse.peacefulscience.org/t/rich-lenski-takes-down-michael-behe-and-his-id-creationism-part-iv/5208)._