# Side Comments: Is there really information being conveyed within a cell?

**URL:** <https://discourse.peacefulscience.org/t/side-comments-is-there-really-information-being-conveyed-within-a-cell/17036>\
**Category:** Side Conversation\
**Tags:** Comments\
**Created:** [February 6, 2025, 5:22pm UTC](https://discourse.peacefulscience.org/t/side-comments-is-there-really-information-being-conveyed-within-a-cell/17036 "2025-02-06T17:22:49Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 1\
**Showing post:** 96

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Faizal\_Ali](https://sea2.discourse-cdn.com/flex016/user_avatar/discourse.peacefulscience.org/faizal_ali/32/12416_2.png) [@Faizal\_Ali](https://discourse.peacefulscience.org/u/Faizal_Ali)\
**Post date:** [March 11, 2025, 6:44pm UTC](https://discourse.peacefulscience.org/t/side-comments-is-there-really-information-being-conveyed-within-a-cell/17036/96 "2025-03-11T18:44:01Z")

</div>

> [@colewd](#):
>
> Do the differences disqualify the inference of design in both cases? My argument is they are simply different designs produced for the purpose of flight. The fact that they both can fly is quite remarkable.

Let’s take another example:

1. Pigeons fly in the sky.
2. Pigeons are birds.
3. Ducks fly in the sky.

Therefore, ducks are birds.

Do you think this reasoning is sound? Think carefully, now…

---

_[View the full topic](https://discourse.peacefulscience.org/t/side-comments-is-there-really-information-being-conveyed-within-a-cell/17036)._