# Side Comments on Ann Gauger's Response to Themelios Review

**URL:** https://discourse.peacefulscience.org/t/side-comments-on-ann-gaugers-response-to-themelios-review/1382
**Category:** Side Conversation
**Created:** [August 26, 2018, 5:49am UTC](https://discourse.peacefulscience.org/t/side-comments-on-ann-gaugers-response-to-themelios-review/1382 "2018-08-26T05:49:09Z")
**Posts on this page:** 1
**Showing post:** 11

<div class="post-metadata">

### Author: ![swamidass](https://sea2.discourse-cdn.com/flex016/user_avatar/discourse.peacefulscience.org/swamidass/32/3_2.png) [@swamidass](https://discourse.peacefulscience.org/u/swamidass)
#### Post date: [August 26, 2018, 6:03pm UTC](https://discourse.peacefulscience.org/t/side-comments-on-ann-gaugers-response-to-themelios-review/1382/11 "2018-08-26T18:03:03Z")

</div>

> [@Ann Gauger's Response to My Themelios Review](https://discourse.peacefulscience.org/t/ann-gaugers-response-to-my-themelios-review/1328/15):
>
> However with science, it’s a case of intentional blindness as much as anything… you can’t decide to strictly stick to methodological materialism and then claim you didn’t find any evidence for God. That’s like a man with his eyes closed sharing he didn’t see anything.

Almost everyone here agrees with this.

> [@Ann Gauger's Response to My Themelios Review](https://discourse.peacefulscience.org/t/ann-gaugers-response-to-my-themelios-review/1328/15):
>
> I frankly don’t get how anyone can look at the complexity and beauty of life and miss that there is a creator. It can’t be more obvious.

I also agree with this. It is obvious, but just not in the language and tools of science.

---

_[View the full topic](https://discourse.peacefulscience.org/t/side-comments-on-ann-gaugers-response-to-themelios-review/1382)._