# Side Comments on Ann Gauger's Response to Themelios Review

**URL:** <https://discourse.peacefulscience.org/t/side-comments-on-ann-gaugers-response-to-themelios-review/1382>\
**Category:** Side Conversation\
**Created:** [August 26, 2018, 5:49am UTC](https://discourse.peacefulscience.org/t/side-comments-on-ann-gaugers-response-to-themelios-review/1382 "2018-08-26T05:49:09Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 1\
**Showing post:** 19

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![gbrooks9](https://sea2.discourse-cdn.com/flex016/user_avatar/discourse.peacefulscience.org/gbrooks9/32/7979_2.png) [@gbrooks9](https://discourse.peacefulscience.org/u/gbrooks9)\
**Post date:** [August 26, 2018, 8:41pm UTC](https://discourse.peacefulscience.org/t/side-comments-on-ann-gaugers-response-to-themelios-review/1382/19 "2018-08-26T20:41:59Z")

</div>

> [@Ann Gauger's Response to My Themelios Review](https://discourse.peacefulscience.org/t/ann-gaugers-response-to-my-themelios-review/1328/23):
>
> An say, that you see the data pointing to God even though scientists don’t interpret it that way. And that is not a presumption

@Ashwin_s

& @swamidass

I think it is. I think it is intuition… not Science!

---

_[View the full topic](https://discourse.peacefulscience.org/t/side-comments-on-ann-gaugers-response-to-themelios-review/1382)._