# Side Comments on Faith Across the Multiverse

**URL:** <https://discourse.peacefulscience.org/t/side-comments-on-faith-across-the-multiverse/1336>\
**Category:** Side Conversation\
**Tags:** BookClub\
**Created:** [August 24, 2018, 1:37am UTC](https://discourse.peacefulscience.org/t/side-comments-on-faith-across-the-multiverse/1336 "2018-08-24T01:37:42Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 1\
**Showing post:** 2

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![swamidass](https://sea2.discourse-cdn.com/flex016/user_avatar/discourse.peacefulscience.org/swamidass/32/3_2.png) [@swamidass](https://discourse.peacefulscience.org/u/swamidass)\
**Post date:** [August 24, 2018, 1:39am UTC](https://discourse.peacefulscience.org/t/side-comments-on-faith-across-the-multiverse/1336/2 "2018-08-24T01:39:55Z")

</div>

> [@Book Club: Faith Across the Multiverse](https://discourse.peacefulscience.org/t/book-club-faith-across-the-multiverse/1330/3):
>
> First line of book: Science is often presented as a set of propositions to affirm. On those terms, the existence of God becomes yet another such proposition, **and all science can offer is a yes or a no.**
> 
> Science is neutral on the existence of God.

Completely agree. We are going to have several points like this come up in the book where we might disagree with wording, or @AndyWalsh’s point. That is okay. We should **_always_** clarify [The Rules of the Game](https://discourse.peacefulscience.org/t/the-rules-of-the-game/226) too. This book is just a welcoming starting point for a larger question. It is not a textbook, nor should we endorse every claim or point @AndyWalsh makes.

---

_[View the full topic](https://discourse.peacefulscience.org/t/side-comments-on-faith-across-the-multiverse/1336)._