# Social Exclusion? But We Dialogue With ID

**URL:** <https://discourse.peacefulscience.org/t/social-exclusion-but-we-dialogue-with-id/13788>\
**Category:** Conversation\
**Tags:** Science, Design, Communication\
**Created:** [May 28, 2021, 6:34pm UTC](https://discourse.peacefulscience.org/t/social-exclusion-but-we-dialogue-with-id/13788 "2021-05-28T18:34:40Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 1\
**Showing post:** 21

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Mercer](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/m/e274bd/32.png) [@Mercer](https://discourse.peacefulscience.org/u/Mercer)\
**Post date:** [May 29, 2021, 2:32pm UTC](https://discourse.peacefulscience.org/t/social-exclusion-but-we-dialogue-with-id/13788/21 "2021-05-29T14:32:01Z")

</div>

> [@Jordan](#):
>
> It seems to me like ID has theories and hypotheses, just not _scientific_ theories or hypotheses.

Indeed. I would have no objection if @pnelson and @Eddie qualified every mention of “ID theorists” by preceding it with “nonscientific.” Do you think they’d do that?

> [@swamidass](#):
>
> They do have scientific hypotheses too.

Then by all means kindly articulate a few of them, along with the names of the one(s) of “they” who have advanced these actual scientific hypotheses, where, and when.

---

_[View the full topic](https://discourse.peacefulscience.org/t/social-exclusion-but-we-dialogue-with-id/13788)._