# The most current philosophical arguments for the existence of God?

**URL:** https://discourse.peacefulscience.org/t/the-most-current-philosophical-arguments-for-the-existence-of-god/15551
**Category:** Conversation
**Tags:** Theology, Philosophy, History, Atheism
**Created:** [November 16, 2022, 8:47pm UTC](https://discourse.peacefulscience.org/t/the-most-current-philosophical-arguments-for-the-existence-of-god/15551 "2022-11-16T20:47:26Z")
**Posts on this page:** 1
**Showing post:** 110

<div class="post-metadata">

### Author: ![structureoftruth](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/s/4bbf92/32.png) [@structureoftruth](https://discourse.peacefulscience.org/u/structureoftruth)
#### Post date: [November 24, 2022, 7:18am UTC](https://discourse.peacefulscience.org/t/the-most-current-philosophical-arguments-for-the-existence-of-god/15551/110 "2022-11-24T07:18:56Z")

</div>

> [@Paul\_King](#):
>
> Feser claims that a material triangle would lack determinacy because it would deviate from perfect triangularity in some, perhaps imperceptible way. I don’t see that semantic content is an issue there at all.

Semantic content is precisely the issue that is in view. The point that Feser is illustrating is that no particular triangle can determinately represent the concept _triangle_ as opposed to something more specific (such as _triangle with these angles and side lengths_) or more general (such as _2-d geometric figure_), and all material triangles have features which are not part of, and in some cases actually at odds with, the concept of triangularity.

---

_[View the full topic](https://discourse.peacefulscience.org/t/the-most-current-philosophical-arguments-for-the-existence-of-god/15551)._