# The most current scientific evidence for the existence of God?

**URL:** <https://discourse.peacefulscience.org/t/the-most-current-scientific-evidence-for-the-existence-of-god/15549>\
**Category:** Conversation\
**Tags:** Science, Design, Atheism, Theology\
**Created:** [November 15, 2022, 2:07pm UTC](https://discourse.peacefulscience.org/t/the-most-current-scientific-evidence-for-the-existence-of-god/15549 "2022-11-15T14:07:42Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 1\
**Showing post:** 99

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Sam](https://sea2.discourse-cdn.com/flex016/user_avatar/discourse.peacefulscience.org/sam/32/11437_2.png) [@Sam](https://discourse.peacefulscience.org/u/Sam)\
**Post date:** [November 21, 2022, 12:08pm UTC](https://discourse.peacefulscience.org/t/the-most-current-scientific-evidence-for-the-existence-of-god/15549/99 "2022-11-21T12:08:44Z")

</div>

> [@Mercer](#):
>
> Have you identified any big Dawkins fans here, Sam?

Not particularly. I’d be surprised that there aren’t some. Would you be surprised to find some "big Dawkins fans here? Is there a requisite number of them or a required ‘bigness’ for my question to be welcome or even allowed?

> [@Mercer](#):
>
> If not, why bring him up instead of having an actual discussion with the people here?

Well to start with, I was directing the comment to an individual person. Is that a problem for you? Why the offense?  
And I was desiring to see how Dawkins’s materialist view of there being no good, fit with faded Glory’s idea that love is an abstraction.  
I’m sorry that you are bothered by the question.

---

_[View the full topic](https://discourse.peacefulscience.org/t/the-most-current-scientific-evidence-for-the-existence-of-god/15549)._