# The Theological Hypothesis of Adam in Science?

**URL:** <https://discourse.peacefulscience.org/t/the-theological-hypothesis-of-adam-in-science/4437>\
**Category:** Conversation\
**Tags:** Science, Theology\
**Created:** [February 11, 2019, 1:48am UTC](https://discourse.peacefulscience.org/t/the-theological-hypothesis-of-adam-in-science/4437 "2019-02-11T01:48:47Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 1\
**Showing post:** 61

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![gbrooks9](https://sea2.discourse-cdn.com/flex016/user_avatar/discourse.peacefulscience.org/gbrooks9/32/7979_2.png) [@gbrooks9](https://discourse.peacefulscience.org/u/gbrooks9)\
**Post date:** [February 14, 2019, 9:26pm UTC](https://discourse.peacefulscience.org/t/the-theological-hypothesis-of-adam-in-science/4437/61 "2019-02-14T21:26:01Z")

</div>

> [@Faizal\_Ali](#):
>
> Any scientist who insists on believing that Adam and Eve is a well-supported scientific hypothesis deserves to be a laughing stock.

@Faizal_Ali

The problem here is the context you set up with the phrases “well-supported” and “scientific hypothesis”. This is an over-reaction.

In the Western world, there are lots of scientists who also claim to be good and devout Christians. Generally speaking, nobody challenges Scientists to explain how they can be men or women of scientists… and still believe Jesus was born miraculously… or whether he was resurrected!

Adam and Eve, being made in miraculous ways, but in the midst of thousands of humans who were created earlier by means of Evolution, should not be much more trouble to understand than a geneticist who puts up Christmas time stockings!

---

_[View the full topic](https://discourse.peacefulscience.org/t/the-theological-hypothesis-of-adam-in-science/4437)._