# Tim Keller is not an Evolutionary Creationist

**URL:** <https://discourse.peacefulscience.org/t/tim-keller-is-not-an-evolutionary-creationist/5890>\
**Category:** Side Conversation\
**Tags:** Society\
**Created:** [April 23, 2019, 5:02am UTC](https://discourse.peacefulscience.org/t/tim-keller-is-not-an-evolutionary-creationist/5890 "2019-04-23T05:02:40Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 1\
**Showing post:** 5

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![swamidass](https://sea2.discourse-cdn.com/flex016/user_avatar/discourse.peacefulscience.org/swamidass/32/3_2.png) [@swamidass](https://discourse.peacefulscience.org/u/swamidass)\
**Post date:** [April 23, 2019, 3:32pm UTC](https://discourse.peacefulscience.org/t/tim-keller-is-not-an-evolutionary-creationist/5890/5 "2019-04-23T15:32:11Z")

</div>

> [@Jonathan\_Burke](#):
>
> I affirm the de novo creation of Adam, and I’m EC.

Well EC specifically denied your position for a decade. Did you even look at their position on EA? They wrote,

> [@The BioLogos Statement on Adam and Eve](https://discourse.peacefulscience.org/t/the-biologos-statement-on-adam-and-eve/5847/3):
>
> While the de novo creation of Adam and Eve is not compatible with what scientists have found in God’s creation

How do you square being EC with that statement? Why did you never object?

---

_[View the full topic](https://discourse.peacefulscience.org/t/tim-keller-is-not-an-evolutionary-creationist/5890)._