Welcome to Terrell Clemmons: Questions on Methodological Naturalism

[Mercer (John Mercer)]

@Ashwin_s

No, I was referring to specific cases where MN is used beyond science to support atheism.
You can go up and read again.

You did, but you also made a far more general (and consequentialist) claim:

@Ashwin_s

What MN does is give many people a way to look at nature without seeing God.
A self imposed blindness if you will.

I’m pointing out that your generalization is false.