For the record, quotes aren’t evidence.
2 Likes
In earlier days the thinking on human evolution may have been more linear, so that outlook has had to broaden. This should not have been really surprising, branching is to be expected. A bushy family tree does not challenge the general progression in features and morphology from common root towards our present.
Where can you find creationist literature predicting that fossils would be continue to be found which defy neat classification into either ape or human? When you consider that YEC holds that all of these must be the remains of descendants of either Noah or some ape which came down the ark’s gangplank, one or the other but they can’t decide which, that is enough to make my head spin.
2 Likes
This topic was automatically closed 7 days after the last reply. New replies are no longer allowed.