It may deserve its own thread. 
Meanwhile, this sentence appears in the Rossian “The Sequence of Creation” graphic:
The cosmological sequence matches the Bible’s sequence exactly.
Ross’ arguments about how “the water cycle develops” is followed by “dry land appears” and then “The translucent atmosphere becomes transparent” depend upon his questionable brand of amateur Hebrew exegesis, among other things. I have great respect for Dr. Ross on multiple levels—especially as a Christ-follower who represents Christ-like qualities very well—but his science accommodationism in Genesis 1 strains my brain. I don’t find it compelling.