An Example of a Substantive, Non-Trivial Dispute Among Evolutionary Theorists

[T_aquaticus]

@Eddie

But T. aquaticus doesn’t, apparently. His reaction to the existence of disagreement among evolutionary theorists was this:

“There are wrong scientists in every field. Pointing to scientists who are wrong is a waste of time.”

That’s a complete misrepresentation of my position. You simply point to disagreement as if it were important. It’s not. What’s important is who is right and who is wrong.