Bayesian inference and the teleological argument

[gbrooks9 (GeorgeB)]

Continuing on from selections of a 2922 thread:

Continuing the discussion from Why are We Disagreeing with ID?:

@swamidass

Are you aware I wrote a book legitimizing the miraculous creation of Adam?
o
o
o
I also think that God’s involvement at times was direct. These things are places of agreement between us and therefore are not plausible explanations why I reject the arguments you are making.

Perhaps it’s because the arguments are making some critical missteps?

And what missteps might there be?!

Here is a rare case where the dialogue is between two Christians who both accept design (to one degree or another).

@swamidass works to use the Design benchmark as a pivot point for the Creationist to take a look at the conventional dispute from an new, UNCONVENTIONAL vantage point.

This would have been impossible if Joshua had started in with the usual points that random nature can do it all!