I initially decided to not participate in this thread. But then I saw a post in another thread which caused my to change my mind.
First a general comment. I don’t actually know whether God can be a useful hypothesis. But, looking at the history of science, I see that at one time phlogiston was hypothesized. That turned out to be wrong. Nevertheless, that hypothesis was useful. The phlogiston hypothesis was testable, and the testing of that hypothesis was part of the origins of modern chemistry.
The best way to show that God can be a useful scientific hypothesis, would be to flesh it out and present an actual testable hypothesis.
I have read the entire thread. I do not find any testable hypothesis there.
My tentative conclusion – you have failed to show what you announced that you intended to show.