Coat color evolution--is there evidence for new mutations?

I know. That fact alone should have been sufficient for you to pause, reconsider, and retract your claim.

I don’t want language, I want evidence. It’s a science thang.

Are there no dark regions in the desert?

Why not multiple alleles in the ancestral population?

I don’t see how the young age of the lava flows suggests new mutations instead of selection for existing alleles. Can you explain?

I’m saying that you have zero evidence that allows you to distinguish between that and:

An allele already present in the ancestral population resulting in black fur allowed the mice to take up a new niche in environments dominated by black basalt rocks.

“Emerged” is a weasel word.

What you said is that they are new. I’m saying that you have no evidence that demonstrates that they weren’t present in the ancestral population and then “emerged.” There are terms in genetics that are more accurate, ya know.

Only if there was no flow between that population and others that live in darker habitats AND there were no dark habitats before the lava flows existed.

Those seem like two mighty big assumptions to me.