Comments on Bill’s math class

[Rumraket (Mikkel R.)]

Hey Bill your previous mathclass was closed before you could around to do any math, or answer questions. Let’s pick up where we left:

@Rumraket

@colewd

@Rumraket

This means Behe & Snoke are modeling a situation where they are demanding a particular set of mutations to evolve to create a new function, with no alternative mutations being able to create a similarly complex function, and that this occurs in one of two copies of a gene where vastly more likely deleterious mutations that render any subsequent mutations invalid, are not purged by selection.

This is a straw man argument.

Oooh I see.

So Bill if my description is correct you then agree that would be an absurd and ridiculous model of evolution, right?

It’s just that you think my description of their models is incorrect, a straw-man. But if it was correct you’d also think it’s a terrible model? I would have a point then, if the model behaved as I described it? My criticisms are valid criticisms of a model that makes those assumptions, you just don’t think their model does that? Do I have that right?

Do you agree that if my characterization is correct, the model is terrible?