That may be so, but the more serious problem is that she has committed exactly the sin of which she accuses Art Hunt: She misrepresents the paper. I am not implying that she has done so dishonestly or intentionally. But she needs to be aware of the fact that few of the readers of ID websites and literature have much scientific background, and rely on her and the few other ID proponents with scientific training to explain the science for them. That is a serious responsibility, and Ann needs to be more careful when summarizing the scientific literature to avoid misleading her readers.