Comments on McLatchie and Swamidass

[colewd (Bill Cole)]

@Art

At the very least, the range of genes that are helpful and positively-selected but have (according to Behe) at least one damaging mutation is 41%-83%. It is not only inappropriate, it is unethical to omit parts of the table so Behe can raise this estimate (so that, I suspect, he can claim “a majority, regardless”).

And that is before we realize that APOB may well not be damaged. This changes things even more.

Why do you think Mike concludes gene damaging adaptions will be more prevalent than gene enhancing adaptions?