No, you’re piggybacking on (and misinterpreting) my comment on the other thread where I said that differing levels of similarity could possibly be explained by separate creation events at different times in history. The entire point here, which I proved in the OP, is that differing levels of similarity aren’t the same as nested hierarchy.
Frankly, I’m not sure how you could misinterpret my comment from before so badly, given that I said (in the exact same comment) that “[Bill’s] hypothesis is still falsified by the fact that these sequences form a nested hierarchy.”