Common Narrative with ID on MN

[cwhenderson (Curtis Henderson)]

@pnelson

For now and the foreseeable future, mainstream science claims to work by MN, whether we like it or not.

As one of the “or nots” how would you “like” to see science change? Would you rather that untestable hypotheses predominate our understanding of the natural world, thus limiting how we study it? I like to think that scientists moved past this quite some time ago with good reason.