I spent a lot of time with the 2005 paper, multiple reads reviewing the references. I thought I must be missing something, that Dembski must be doing something I didn’t understand. How else could he have probabilities greater than one? Elberry and Shallit (2011) covered everything else, I’m surprised they missed this.
Related topics
Topic | Replies | Views | Activity | |
---|---|---|---|---|
Why are We Disagreeing with ID? | 708 | 7366 | July 11, 2022 | |
Evidence of a synthetic origin of sars-cov-2 | 55 | 1655 | November 8, 2022 | |
Dembski and Swamidass: What is the Status of the Explanatory Filter? | 59 | 4856 | June 25, 2020 | |
Does Science Consider Design Without Considering a Designer? | 19 | 1697 | June 9, 2020 | |
Did Intelligent Design Just Miss Its Corona Moment? | 1 | 652 | August 31, 2020 |