Privately maybe. They watch these forums closely and there’s no way I’m telegraphing all my critiques so that they can choreograph their misinformation campaign ahead of time. If Behe had done what I did (contact the authors of the papers he discusses), he might have avoided all the errors he made. Or, he could have received the critiques from the normal process of peer review. There’s a reason why we cherish that process - it improves our work immensely! My first book had three anonymous peer reviews, experts in their fields. My second one had FIVE different reviewers (although they weren’t anonymous, one was a PhD scientist and another was an MD). Behe opted out of that process, so now he’s subjected to the harshness of public peer review. He knew that.