According to Biologos, the keynote example of nature creating something was the evolution of nylonese bacterium and we all know how that turned out. God made nature to be capable of things that nature can do and designing and creating is not one of them. Instead, God did exactly as He stated: He created plant and animal “kinds” which were graced with adaptation qualities in order to survive on a planet “subjected to futility” after the fall of man. The God of Scripture never claimed to be part of nature, but instead transcendent from it. So if He claims to be the Creator of kinds, then He did so SUPER naturally. The theistic evolutionary terms match more greek myth/ eastern mysticism worldview and less the judeo Christian perspective. Again, to try to marry naturalistic evolutionary terms bordering mysticism and atheistic naturalism with God centered creationism makes no sense. It robs God of the glory by highjacking His Word then leaves Him in the dust while man puffs his ego. This reminds me about an article i read i think on CNN this pm about 3 women along w their young children who entered a store, created a distraction enough to allow one of them to make it out safely with a stolen baby stroller. They may have been successful in their scheme except for one small problem: They realized that they had to return to the scene of the crime when they left behind the precious cargo the stroller was meant for: one of their very children! This is what theistic evolution does- it steals the historical narrative in Scripture to be exchanged with their own with supposed intentions to accredit God but all the while, the process causes God to actually be left behind.