It is not a “label” Bill, it is an “informal fallacy” – i.e. something that is wrong as a matter of logic.
Given that:
-
Gpuccio has expertise in neither population genetics nor logic;
-
Gpuccio’s claims discussed on the Intelligent Design and design detection thread demonstrated extremely muddled thinking on his part; and
-
Uncommon Descent’s notoriously low standards,
why would you expect anybody to bother reading his 9000-word screed on that site?
To defend a position that nobody seems to find credible, you have directed us to an overly-long screed by somebody who we don’t see as credible, published on a site that we don’t see as credible.