I provided the probabilities you asked for and showed how you were wrong about Mendelian genetics and Punnett squares, and that is the only part of my post you replied to? You’re a kook.
You’re also a totally wrong kook.
For diploid organisms, the alleles in the descents of the founders of a lineage will not all be from the founders, since mating outside the lineage can introduce other alleles. The frequency of a new allele in a diploid population will be 1/2n,not 1/n. Random walk calculations are not relevant to the creation of new alleles, only their subsequent spreading. Punnett squares are relevant - they provide the probabilities for the steps in the random walk.
You’re also wrong that the limiting number of members in a diploid lineage is 2 (it’s 1); that allele lineages start with a single male and a single female (they start with individuals of either gender in larger populations); that the probability of a recombination event is computable from the allele frequencies (you also need to know the assortiveness, the zygosity and possibly which chromosome the alleles are on); that selection is competition; that competition slows adaptation; that E. coli and humans don’t have a common ancestor; and that those people who know they do are ignoring Kishony’s and Lenski’s work. Those are just from one post.
Ask yours.