So be upfront about the limits/limitations of the scientific method.
Instead of assuming MN and begging the question in articles to popularize science, be upfront and say these are the options currently available to explain the origin of lIfe.
Be upfront about the assumptions being made.
A disclaimer would work fine… In my country we have these disclaimers before Mutual fund adds. Perhaps scientists should tag in a disclaimer before going question begging about whether life arose by fluke of it was the “laws of nature”.
By the way, how do you test for unknown flukes/laws of nature? Why mention them if you are not in a position to test it?